What eLORA is, and what it will not do for you
eLORA is the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board's online system for e-Licensing of Radiation Applications, and it is the only channel through which a hospital transacts with AERB about its radiation-emitting equipment. The institute registers itself there. Equipment is declared there. A Radiological Safety Officer is nominated and approved there. Licences are issued and renewed there. There is no useful parallel paper route. If a machine does not appear in your eLORA account against your institute, then as far as the regulator is concerned that machine is not a legally commissioned installation, whatever the purchase invoice says.
What eLORA will not do is manage your compliance for you. It is a registry and a transaction system, not a reminder engine. It will not tell you that a CT licence lapses in six weeks, that your only approved RSO resigned in March, or that the mobile X-ray unit parked in the orthopaedic ward was never declared because it arrived as a demonstration piece and quietly stayed. Those omissions surface during an inspection or at the moment you attempt a renewal, which is the most expensive moment to discover them.
The mental model worth carrying is three linked objects. The institute is the licensee, tied to one physical premises. Equipment items hang off the institute, each with a make, model, serial number, room and status. People hang off both: the employer, the approved RSO, and the radiation workers whose dose records you maintain. Nearly every eLORA problem an administrator meets is a mismatch between those three, such as a working machine in a room that was never approved, or an RSO whose approval scope no longer covers the equipment you now own.

Registering the institute and getting the employer account right
The first transaction is institute registration, and it is worth doing slowly because everything else inherits from it. You create an employer login, declare the legal entity that owns the facility, and record the premises address. That address should match the physical location of the machines and the address on your Clinical Establishments Act registration. A hospital group running three sites will usually need three institute registrations, not one, because the licence attaches to premises rather than to a brand. Getting this wrong is painful to unwind later, since equipment already declared has to be migrated.
The second decision is who the employer is. In AERB's framing the employer carries statutory responsibility for radiation safety at the installation, so this should be a person with actual authority in the organisation, typically the medical superintendent, chief executive or a designated director. The recurring mistake is registering under the personal email address of an IT contractor or a junior executive who leaves within the year. When that happens the account becomes unreachable, password resets go to a dead mailbox, and a renewal that should take an afternoon takes two months of correspondence.
Use an institutional mailbox that survives staff turnover, such as a radiation safety address monitored by more than one person. Record the credentials in whatever privileged-access store your IT team already uses rather than in a diary. Keep a scanned set of the entity documents in a single folder, because you will be asked for the same five documents again at every renewal and every new equipment declaration, and hunting for the trust deed each time is a self-inflicted delay.
Documents to assemble before you open the institute registration form
- Registration certificate of the legal entity that owns the facility
- Clinical Establishments Act or state health authority registration for the premises
- PAN and address proof matching the physical site, not the head office
- Appointment letter and consent of the person named as employer
- Qualification certificates of the person you intend to nominate as RSO
The nomination chain from radiation professional to approved RSO
You cannot hold equipment licences without an approved Radiological Safety Officer, and you cannot nominate an RSO who does not already hold the right qualification. The chain runs in one direction only. A suitably qualified person, usually a medical physicist, radiological physicist or a radiographer with the prescribed academic background, completes the AERB-recognised radiological safety officer training and certification for the relevant class of practice. The employer then nominates that certified person through eLORA. AERB reviews and approves the nomination. Only after that approval do equipment licence applications for the institute move forward.
The scope matters more than administrators expect. Certification and approval are tied to a category of practice, so the person approved for diagnostic radiology is not automatically competent, in the regulator's eyes, for nuclear medicine or for teletherapy. A hospital that adds a cathlab, a PET-CT or a linear accelerator to an existing diagnostic radiology footprint is adding a new class of practice and must check whether its current RSO approval covers it. Discovering this after the equipment is installed and the department has committed to a launch date is a common and avoidable stall.
Plan the succession. An RSO who resigns leaves the institute without a valid nomination, and the replacement chain, involving a qualified candidate, a certification course with limited seats and an approval turnaround, is not something you complete in a fortnight. The trade-off is real: sponsoring a second person through certification costs money and study leave for a role you hope never becomes vacant. Hospitals that skip it usually pay more later, in the form of a renewal that cannot be filed because the nominated officer no longer works there.

Declaring equipment when the list runs past twenty machines
Each equipment item is declared with its make, model, serial number, type approval status, the room it sits in, the supplier and its commissioning date. Type approval is the gate that catches people out. AERB maintains a list of type-approved equipment models, and a machine whose model is not type approved cannot simply be licensed on the strength of a good clinical evaluation. That check belongs in procurement, before the purchase order, not in the commissioning week when the department has already scheduled its first patients.
Once you pass roughly fifteen machines, memory stops working as an inventory system. Build a single equipment register that is authoritative, holds every radiation-emitting device the hospital owns, and reconciles to the eLORA list on a fixed cycle. The register should record the eLORA equipment identifier alongside your own biomedical asset code, so that a service engineer's job card, an AMC record and a licence entry all point at the same physical machine. Without that shared key, reconciliation degrades into a spreadsheet argument about which serial number is correct.
The uncomfortable part of the first reconciliation is that most hospitals find gaps. Machines that were replaced but never removed from the list, machines that moved rooms without an amendment, and machines that were never declared at all. Declare them, amend them, and accept that a candid catch-up is safer than a tidy fiction. The cost is a period of visible correction that nobody enjoys. The alternative is an inspector finding the same gaps with the file open in front of you.
Radiation equipment hospitals routinely forget to declare
- Mobile X-ray units used in ICU, wards and the neonatal unit
- C-arms and O-arms belonging to the operation theatre, not to radiology
- Dental intraoral and OPG units in the dental OPD
- Bone mineral densitometry scanners parked under a physician's department
- Demonstration or loan machines from a supplier that never went back
“Our first honest reconciliation turned up four machines nobody had declared, including a C-arm that had been in theatre for six years. Fixing it voluntarily was uncomfortable. Being shown it during an inspection would have been far worse.”
Room layout approval and the shielding submission
Layout approval comes before installation, and it is a technical submission rather than a formality. You provide a scaled plan of the room with dimensions, the construction and lead equivalence of every wall, door and viewing window, the position of the control console and protective barrier, the location of warning lights and signage, and the assumed workload of the machine. Crucially, you also state what lies on every side of the room, above it and below it, because the occupancy of adjacent spaces drives the shielding calculation as much as the tube output does.
The failure mode is architectural optimism. A plan is drawn early, the workload is assumed at a comfortable figure, and the space next door is described as a corridor. By the time the department opens, the corridor has become a nurse station with a person sitting in it for eight hours a day, and the machine is running three times the assumed workload because referrals grew. Retrofitting lead into a live department means closing the room, breaking walls and losing revenue, so it is worth over-specifying occupancy at design stage rather than under-specifying it.
After installation, commissioning depends on a quality assurance test and a radiation survey performed by an agency recognised for the purpose. The report from that test is one of the documents you will be asked for repeatedly, by AERB at renewal and by a NABH assessor walking through your imaging department. File it against the equipment record, not in a personal drive, and diarise the next test at the interval applicable to that class of equipment rather than waiting for someone to remember.

What a layout submission has to state clearly
- Room dimensions with the position and orientation of the tube
- Lead equivalence of walls, door, viewing window and protective barrier
- Occupancy classification of every adjacent space, including above and below
- Assumed workload in the units AERB expects for that modality
- Location of warning lights, signage and the operator console
Renewal, decommissioning and transfers between your own sites
Licences are issued for a defined validity and renewal is an application, not an automatic rollover. A renewal that reaches AERB after expiry leaves a window in which the installation is operating without a valid licence, and there is no retrospective cure for that window. Start the renewal well before expiry, because the supporting evidence, particularly current quality assurance test reports and a valid RSO approval, often needs work of its own. A renewal blocked because the QA agency cannot schedule a visit for three weeks is entirely predictable and entirely preventable.
Disposal is the step nobody plans. A radiation-emitting machine cannot simply be sold to a scrap dealer or handed to a second-hand vendor when it is replaced. The disposal or transfer has to be recorded, the receiving party's status matters, and where equipment contains radioactive sources rather than only an X-ray tube, the requirements are considerably stricter and involve the source's own custody trail. Moving a machine from your city hospital to your district branch is also a change of premises, which means the equipment record has to follow it.
Run a licence diary with named owners and lead times rather than a single expiry date. Ninety days out, someone confirms the QA test is booked. Sixty days out, someone confirms the RSO approval is current and the employer details are unchanged. Thirty days out, the application is filed. It is administrative and dull, and it is the difference between a renewal that takes an afternoon and one that becomes a departmental crisis with patients being rescheduled.
Making it a standing process rather than an annual scramble
The hospitals that find this easy have stopped treating AERB work as a project. They run a monthly reconciliation between three lists: the biomedical asset register, the eLORA equipment list and the room inventory maintained by the RSO. Any row appearing in one list and not the others is an exception with a name against it. The meeting takes twenty minutes when nothing has changed, which is most months, and catches the newly arrived C-arm in the month it arrives rather than three years later.
Split the ownership honestly. The RSO owns the technical judgements, survey reports and worker monitoring. The administrator owns the portal transactions and the document set. Biomedical engineering owns the asset data and the service history. Human resources has to flag any exit involving the RSO or a radiation worker, because those exits have regulatory consequences that HR would otherwise never think to report. Where your systems allow it, hold the licence expiry date on the equipment record itself, so that HealUDoc asset and document registries fire the reminder from the same place the service contract renewal does.
None of this is intellectually difficult. It is a records discipline applied consistently to a set of objects that keep moving, in a department where clinical pressure always outranks paperwork. The honest cost is a named person spending perhaps two days a month on it across a twenty-machine estate. The honest benefit is that an AERB inspection, an accreditation assessment and a new equipment commissioning all draw on the same maintained file rather than triggering three separate scrambles through the same cupboard.


